Something to check, not a finding

The record disagrees with itself · Contract 24J00092

The project says ongoing, but progress says 100%

ASSET PRESERVATION - REHABILITATION/ RECONSTRUCTION OF ROADS WITH SLIPS, SLOPE COLLAPSE, AND LANDSLIDE - SECONDARY ROADS - SLOPE PROTECTION ALONG SEIT-TAYUNGAN-CAMP ANDRES ROAD SECTION

Recorded project budget
₱69,475,000.00
Status / progress
On-Going / 100.0%
Location
Region IX, Region IX

Why Busisi flagged this

What we noticed

Status is On-Going; reported progress is 100.0%.

Why check it: The status and progress fields should describe the same point in the work.

What to check next: Check the latest project update, completion record, and inspection documents.

Technical details

The status field may update later than the progress field.

Rule code
status_progress_conflict
Snapshot fingerprint
5b411cf3f112fabd…
Open the project record

Congressional context

No exact office attribution available

The listed office did not match a published office-to-district mapping.

Recorded contractor identities

Every party stated in the project record

No PCAB ID stated

ST. MATTHEW GEN. CONTRACTOR & DEVELOPMENT CORP. ([REVOKED] 40908)

50 archived project associations · ₱4,225,425,475.78

Open contractor activity

Other things to check

1 other flag on this contract

  • We do not have enough information yetThe project has no usable coordinates

    What we noticed: The archived DPWH record has no usable latitude and longitude pair.

    What this does not prove: Missing coordinates do not prove that the project is missing.

    See why this was flagged