Independent Philippine budget evidence project FY2027 NEP to House change ledger

Deterministic review desk

Start with the records that moved.

Rank FY2027 project changes, inspect geographic concentrations, trace repeated project-family candidates, and export the evidence for independent review.

Not a corruption score.

Rankings identify records that meet a deterministic review rule. Similar wording, a large increase, or a House-only row does not establish duplication, authorship, illegality, or wrongdoing.

Loading reconciled totals…

0 candidates meet this rule. Loading review candidates…

Download evidence CSV

Priority queue

Records to inspect first

Concentration

Where movement is grouped

Rule boundaries

What these queues can and cannot establish.

The repeated-family rule uses the same conservative normalized project-family identity as the historical appropriation explorer. Similar-family candidates share that label inside the same FY2027 dataset.

  • Large movement is ordered by exact integer-centavo arithmetic.
  • Concentration is an aggregate observation, not evidence against an office or region.
  • Family matches may join separate phases and always require documentary review.
  • Physical existence, procurement conduct and political authorship require additional evidence.

Evidence gaps

Unavailable means unavailable.

Busisi does not generate a label when the evidence required for that label has not been acquired.

Partial

Full insertion analysis

The FY2027 ledger covers four project-level programs from NEP to House. Senate, bicameral and enacted GAA stages remain unavailable.

Not available

Physical existence verification

Requires implementation evidence such as geotagged progress, inspections, audit findings, or field verification. Budget data alone cannot establish physical existence.

Partial

Procurement consistency

ABC, award, status, and physical-progress checks require current DPWH detail and PhilGEPS records beyond the archived bulk snapshot.