Something to check, not a finding

The record disagrees with itself · Contract 24PA0021

The project says ongoing, but progress says 100%

OO1: ENSURE SAFE AND RELIABLE NATIONAL ROAD SYSTEM, ASSET PRESERVATION-PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE-TERTIARY ROADS, ABRA-CERVANTES ROAD, K0431+(-527)-K0433+142, LAGANGILANG AND BUCAY, ABRA

Recorded project budget
₱37,057,242.00
Status / progress
On-Going / 100.0%
Location
Abra DEO, Cordillera Administrative Region

Why Busisi flagged this

What we noticed

Status is On-Going; reported progress is 100.0%.

Why check it: The status and progress fields should describe the same point in the work.

What to check next: Check the latest project update, completion record, and inspection documents.

Technical details

The status field may update later than the progress field.

Rule code
status_progress_conflict
Snapshot fingerprint
5b411cf3f112fabd…
Open the project record

Office-linked congressional context

Abra DEO

  • Abra, Lone DistrictBernos, JB

District context is inferred only from the listed DPWH office. It does not show who requested, sponsored, controlled, or is responsible for a project or amount.

Recorded contractor identities

Every party stated in the project record

Other things to check

1 other flag on this contract

  • The recorded place may not matchSeveral projects use the same coordinates

    What we noticed: Coordinate 17.5782766, 120.7646709 is shared by: 24PA0021, 25PA0027.

    What this does not prove: Projects can share a site, entrance, office, or map point. Reuse does not prove duplication.

    See why this was flagged