Busisi
Something to check, not a finding

The record disagrees with itself · Contract 24PA0101

The project says ongoing, but progress says 100%

ORGANIZATIONAL OUTCOME 1: ENSURE SAFE AND RELIABLE NATIONAL ROAD SYSTEM, ASSET PRESERVATION PROGRAM, REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION OF ROADS WITH SLIPS, SLOPE COLLAPSE AND LANDSLIDE-TERTIARY ROADS, ABRA-CERVANTES ROAD-K0456+030-K0456+050, K0447+300-K0447+3

Recorded project budget
₱7,330,377.44
Status / progress
On-Going / 100.0%
Location
Abra DEO, Cordillera Administrative Region

Why Busisi flagged this

What we noticed

Status is On-Going; reported progress is 100.0%.

Why check it: The status and progress fields should describe the same point in the work.

What to check next: Check the latest project update, completion record, and inspection documents.

Technical details

The status field may update later than the progress field.

Rule code
status_progress_conflict
Snapshot fingerprint
5b411cf3f112fabd…
Open the project record

Office-linked congressional context

Abra DEO

  • Abra, Lone DistrictBernos, JB

District context is inferred only from the listed DPWH office. It does not show who requested, sponsored, controlled, or is responsible for a project or amount.

Recorded contractor identities

Every party stated in the project record

Other things to check

1 other flag on this contract

  • The recorded place may not matchSeveral projects use the same coordinates

    What we noticed: Coordinate 17.3938778, 120.7067028 is shared by: 24PA0101, 24PA0121.

    What this does not prove: Projects can share a site, entrance, office, or map point. Reuse does not prove duplication.

    See why this was flagged