Something to check, not a finding

The record disagrees with itself · Contract 25CF0136

The project says ongoing, but progress says 100%

BASIC INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM (BIP) - MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDINGS/FACILITIES TO SUPPORT SOCIAL SERVICES - CONSTRUCTION OF MULTI-PURPOSE BUILDING (COVERED COURT), BARANGAY LAGARE, CABANATUAN CITY, NUEVA ECIJA

Recorded project budget
₱5,907,240.08
Status / progress
On-Going / 100.0%
Location
Nueva Ecija 2nd DEO, Region III

Why Busisi flagged this

What we noticed

Status is On-Going; reported progress is 100.0%.

Why check it: The status and progress fields should describe the same point in the work.

What to check next: Check the latest project update, completion record, and inspection documents.

Technical details

The status field may update later than the progress field.

Rule code
status_progress_conflict
Snapshot fingerprint
5b411cf3f112fabd…
Open the project record

Office-linked congressional context

Nueva Ecija 2nd DEO

  • Nueva Ecija, 3rd DistrictVergara, Julius Cesar "Jay" V.
  • Nueva Ecija, 4th DistrictPascual, Emerson D.

District context is inferred only from the listed DPWH office. It does not show who requested, sponsored, controlled, or is responsible for a project or amount.

Recorded contractor identities

Every party stated in the project record

Other things to check

0 other flags on this contract

No published item needs checking under the current rules.