Something to check, not a finding

The record disagrees with itself · Contract 25HH0029

The project says ongoing, but progress says 100%

CONVERGENCE AND SPECIAL SUPPORT PROGRAM-SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS ALLEVIATING GAPS (SIPAG)-ACCESS ROADS AND/OR BRIDGES FROM THE NATIONAL ROAD/S LEADING TO MAJOR/STRATEGIC PUBLIC BUILDINGS/FACILITIES- CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD, BARANGAY BUDLAAN, CEBU

Recorded project budget
₱14,479,500.00
Status / progress
On-Going / 100.0%
Location
Cebu City DEO, Region VII

Why Busisi flagged this

What we noticed

Status is On-Going; reported progress is 100.0%.

Why check it: The status and progress fields should describe the same point in the work.

What to check next: Check the latest project update, completion record, and inspection documents.

Technical details

The status field may update later than the progress field.

Rule code
status_progress_conflict
Snapshot fingerprint
5b411cf3f112fabd…
Open the project record

Office-linked congressional context

Cebu City DEO

  • Cebu City, 1st DistrictDel Mar, Rachel Marguerite B.
  • Cebu City, 2nd DistrictRama, Eduardo Jr. R.

District context is inferred only from the listed DPWH office. It does not show who requested, sponsored, controlled, or is responsible for a project or amount.

Recorded contractor identities

Every party stated in the project record

Other things to check

1 other flag on this contract

  • The recorded place may not matchSeveral projects use the same coordinates

    What we noticed: Coordinate 10.3698278, 123.8997722 is shared by: 25HH0027, 25HH0029, 25HH0034, 25HH0050, 25HH0082, 25HH0083, 25HH0101.

    What this does not prove: Projects can share a site, entrance, office, or map point. Reuse does not prove duplication.

    See why this was flagged